CEO Keywordspy | Internet Marketer
Archive for November, 2011
Weight Watchers and the Seven Lessons
Nov 8th
ANA Masters of Marketing attendees were treated to a case history from Cheryl Callan, Senior Vice President, Marketing Weight Watchers International, Inc. Cheryl set the stage for the discussion noting that Weight Watchers sales closely tracks the consumer confidence index which has created serious challenges for the brand. That ultimate human ability to procrastinate along with the view that investments in weight loss are seen as a luxury by many compound the problem as Weight Watchers competes in the 3.7B space.
To tackle the challenge, Cheryl noted that Weight Watchers is not in the business to try to convince customers to lose weight, rather to inspire people to believe the can. To “stop dieting and start living” they’ve launched The Points Plus program which has been their most significant program innovation in 13 years. The results are bearing themselves out with 2 million people currently succeeding with the program.
One lesson learned through their efforts is that “talking at consumers” doesn’t work, it’s “like wallpaper”; it’s better to unlock the power of your brand advocates. Lucky for them they have many to work with; more than 2 million page views on weightwatchers.com and 1 million visits on Facebook highlights a large pool to activate on their platforms. To unlock the power of advocacy Weight Watchers has tapped into the fact that their customers were “social before social was digital”. Word of mouth was key before digital and that hasn’t changed. These social platforms play a key ingredient in the success as it gives members a place to connect and to share, speak the truth to one another and even brag about successes.
Weight Watchers has viewed celebrity endorsements as part of the problem in the industry, but given the right approach could be used as part of the solution. After sharing an amusing mash up video of celebrity endorsements gone wrong (no names will be disclosed to protect the innocent) Cheryl shared their views that Jennifer Hudson tenure endorsing Weight Watchers has been an unqualified success. This view was supported by a video clip from the ultimate endorser Oprah Winfrey who reacted dramatically and favorably after viewing Jennifer’s Weight Watchers spot.
What set this session apart from others was the dual presenter format where Cheryl presented the case history accompanied by Nick Brien Chairman and Chief Executive Officer – McCann Worldgroup who interjected throughout with higher level learnings and take-aways that all marketers could learn from, regardless of industry. Throughout the session Nick touched on and intertwined these key learnings; a great list to keep handy when thinking through most any marketing challenge:
- The consumer comes first, and the category second.
- You must find a simple human truth.
- Innovation can happen within the existing brand paradigm change for change’s sake is not a strategy.
- Bring social media principles to traditional channels.
- Don’t allow copy testing to replace creativity and innovation.
- Learn how to experiment forward with your agency partner.
- Never underestimate the power of a big, transformative, idea.
Peter Zmijewski is the founder and CEO at KeywordSpy. Through Internet Marketing he places his name on great search engine like-GOOGLE who is also called as Innovator, Investor, Internet Marketing Guru and Entrepreneur. For more updates don’t go away, please stay with us.
How Search Volume Affects Brand Links
Nov 7th
Distilled’s Tom Critchlow recently gave a presentation on SEO Ranking Factors at Digital East. One of the key points he made is how brand links could potentially be affected by search volume. The higher the search volume for your brand, the more likely you are to appear in the brand links.
What is a Brand Link?
In May of 2010, Google announced via their blog that they had made brand refinements for product information in Google. Google’s intent was to help inform users who are looking for information about a product, but are also unfamiliar with the brands that are associated with that product. The purpose of the brand links is to make it easier for users to find “popular” brands. According to their post, these “popular” brands are determined algorithmically.
For some head terms, these brand links would appear right below the paid search ads. These are especially influential for companies in the e-commerce space because it always helps to be associated as a “popular” brand with any product.
Keyword Search Volume and Its Impact on Brand Links
One possible reason is due to increased search volume for the brand “American Eagle” in conjunction with the keyword “jacket”. This was identified using Google’s Insights for Search, which provides information about search volume trends. Thus, it is possible that Google is taking notice of which head terms are being associated with which brands, particularly in search queries. The rising searches below appear to be very similar to the type of brands that have brand links for the head term “jackets”.This type of scenario also applies for other head terms, such as “sneakers”.
Below is a breakdown of the totals for all the brand links + the keyword sneakers using the Google Insights for Search tool. According to Google, the totals numbers represent the number of searches conducted for a relative term compared to the number of searches on Google overtime.
Other Potential Factors
Upon further investigation, such as observing the rising search trends, there is evidence indicating that search volume is not the only factor influencing brand links. If that was the case, then “Adidas” sneakers should also have a brand link.
Although, it’s not entirely clear why “Adidas” was left out of the brand links, a couple of hypotheses can be construed. For example, perhaps Google is taking into account the number of news mentions for a brand or even the number of social media mentions.
I tested out some examples of news mentions. In this case, Adidas sneakers received 96 Google News mentions.On the other hand, New Balance sneakers, which has a brand link, received about 202 news mentions.
Peter Zmijewski is the founder and CEO at KeywordSpy. Through Internet Marketing he places his name on great search engine like-GOOGLE who is also called as Innovator, Investor, Internet Marketing Guru and Entrepreneur. For more updates don’t go away, please stay with us.
Ford Shows Off New Promotion Strategy
Nov 5th
To celebrate the launch of the 2012 Ford Escape, the company, who has a sizable presence at BlogWorld, Ford announced the Escape Routes that will show an entirely new method of vehicular promotion.
While discussing the benefits of the new Escape model you can apparently open the trunk with your foot some of the details of the promotional strategy were revealed. In order to promote the vehicle, Ford is having it take part on some global adventures. It appears as if Ford is tapping into the reality television The Amazing Race model by having teams compete while showing off the new Escape. However, instead of racing to see who comes in first, the winners will be decided by voters.
The teams will be competing in what speaker Jim Farley referred to as a “series of spontaneous adventures.”
Apparently, the social media aspect of the web is going to come into play a great deal as well, because Farley mentions using the “social media graph” in order to win. To facilitate the social aspect of Escape Routes, the teams will make short videos to promote the competition and each team will feature blogger/content creator with them.
During the presentation, Farley stressed that people are desperate for authentic content, which is what motivated the Escape Routes promotion. Farley also feels that vehicles are social objects, and if you doubt that, ask yourself why people spend so much on stereos and/or chrome rims.
It’s all about getting noticed, as are new approaches to marketing, which is something Ford is clearly committed to.
Peter Zmijewski is the founder and CEO at KeywordSpy. Through Internet Marketing he places his name on great search engine like-GOOGLE who is also called as Innovator, Investor, Internet Marketing Guru and Entrepreneur. For more updates don’t go away, please stay with us.
Internet Explorer Market Share Continues to Decrease
Nov 4th
While it’s still more popular than the other browsers combined, the fact that Internet Explorer’s market share has fallen under the 50 percent mark is an eye-opening event. This marks the first time IE has ever been reduced to under half. Granted, Microsoft’s browser is under the line by about .42 percentage points, the fact remains, under half of the world’s Internet users are doing so with Internet Explorer.
Does this mean the end of IE as we know it? Not exactly. As indicated, even with it falling under the halfway point in terms of usage, at 49.58 percent of the market share, Internet Explorer still has more users than the rest of the listed browsers combined. According to the report from NetMarketShare, via FavBrowser.com, Internet Explorer’s two biggest competitors, Firefox and Chrome, have a combined market share of 37.8 percent. It’s only when you add in the reach of Safari, Opera and the ubiquitous “other” browser (8.54%, 1.49%, and 2.59%), does the total number eclipse IE’s share.
While some are sounding alarms about Internet Explorer’s reduction in usage, the fact that almost half of the population on the web still uses it helps quantify the following statement from the W3 Schools website, which has a large following of Firefox users — 39.7 percent of the site’s visitors in September 2011 used Mozilla’s browser, compared to just 22.9 percent using Internet Explorer:
W3Schools is a website for people with an interest for web technologies. These people are more interested in using alternative browsers than the average user. The average user tends to the browser that comes preinstalled with their computer, and do not seek out other browser alternatives.
The bold section of the previous blockquote helps explain Internet Explorer’s still sizable market share quite well. Of course, as more and more people move away from the traditional methods of browsing in favor of mobile devices and tablet computers, expect these numbers to continue their adjustment.
Besides Internet Explorer’s drop in usage, another thing that stands out is Google Chrome’s increase, which was by more than one percentage point. In September, Chrome’s share was 15.17 percent, and for October, its share increased to 16.59 percent. Google’s browser was the the largest gaining in terms of market share. In fact, it was the only browser to increase by a full point.
Safari experienced gains as well, but not as much as Chrome. Apple’s browser saw its market share increase by .51 percentage points, making it the second highest browser in terms of gains.
Peter Zmijewski is the founder and CEO at KeywordSpy. Through Internet Marketing he places his name on great search engine like-GOOGLE who is also called as Innovator, Investor, Internet Marketing Guru and Entrepreneur. For more updates don’t go away, please stay with us.
Is Google Too Big To Fail?
Nov 3rd
We are better off if we ignore what Google is saying and follow one thing: Google wants more money for Google. When we make this assumption, everything Google does makes sense. Deception and doublespeak are logical and expected rather than shocking and upsetting.
When it comes to scale, as pointed out with Groupon, all of these rules go out the window. If you look at the biggest advertisers, replace their account with one with no history and the brand “Geico” with “SEOBook auto insurance” and the campaign will simply not run. You are spam. In some cases larger advertisers are able to run ads which are clearly deceptive and go against guidelines which they actively enforce on smaller advertisers. I have a strong suspicion now that this is in fact institutionalized in Google’s rating process rather than any employee going out of their way to overturn some sort of penalty.
Google will not disrupt a site or advertiser that will negatively impact their own quarterly earnings. When Google does disrupt one, it is because they have a backup in place. That backup may be their own internal project or a competitor of yours who sends 95% of their advertising through Google’s ad platforms. When Google claimed they were going after content farms, and Demand Media’s properties were spared, the reason was obvious, because it would have visibly impacted their bottom line.
Brand is a deceptive concept. A hairy, smelly drug addict that compulsively molests women is not a sex offender but rather a globally famous rock star. Much the same holds true to many of the biggest brands. As long as a brand spams, that spam is opaque to Google’s customer base and their customers do not bring a negative association with Google’s brand. However, when that same hairy, smelly drug addict is anonymous he is a nuisance which destroys your reputation when you publicly associate yourself with him.
Google is like an oil company which not only dictates the price of oil but also chooses where an oil field will exist. Google is now “too big to fail” as indicated by the recent DOJ investigation which could have resulted in a felony charge for their co-founder, and most certainly would have for a smaller firm without $500m of liquid cash. We should be thankful that visitors are still directed to our websites when they could simply receive excerpts of what they are searching for.
My conclusion: first, I monetize my existing sites with Google’s own products as much as possible. Second: I no longer invest my time or money in new businesses that require Google’s traffic. Google should expect more walled content gardens in their future. Google’s biggest challengers such as Facebook and Apple recognize this, and their platforms are very much walled gardens. That is too bad for the web as we know it today.
Peter Zmijewski is the founder and CEO at KeywordSpy. Through Internet Marketing he places his name on great search engine like-GOOGLE who is also called as Innovator, Investor, Internet Marketing Guru and Entrepreneur. For more updates don’t go away, please stay with us.
Bing and Yahoo Alliance Reaches More Countries: Implications on Your Keyword Research
Nov 2nd
Once upon a time, there were three search engines dominating the market: Google, Yahoo, and MSN. Eventually though, Google got the better part of the competition, and Yahoo declined a bit in its standing. MSN reinvented itself as Bing, the “decision search engine”, and posed a threat to Google. In its attempt to gain market share, it came to the aid of the ailing Yahoo, and took over its search mechanism, causing Yahoo in the US to reflect its results.
From the early beginnings in the US, Bing and Yahoo’s alliance with each other have slowly transitioned to other countries. The merger, which has been one of the biggest threats to Google keyword search-wise, has become widespread in just a short span of time, as Yahoo has begun planning the move of their sites to the Bing back-end. Seven countries have begun to employ similar results for Bing and Yahoo.
Even as this may prove to be a costly move on the part of both Yahoo and Microsoft, it will eventually pay off, as Yahoo will then save money on the transition costs and maintaining the search algorithm and keyword-generated ads.
In the deal, Bing will be in charge of the search algorithm as well as the search-by-keyword ads, with Yahoo giving Microsoft 12% of search a profit. Such a deal will make the merger punching above the normal draw for more marketers as well as SEOs. At present, Bing-Yahoo is composed of 30% of the US market, with Yahoo remaining a crucial player for a lot of regions worldwide.
Most of Yahoo’s attachment to Bing would include 19 countries all in all, including a historic 7 countries for the update carried out last August 19, 2011. Such additions would also take place in Finland, Denmark, Austria and the Netherlands.
The only odd country out in this worldwide merger is Japan, whose Yahoo keyword search results will be powered by Google. For other countries that are about to be part of the alternate Google Yahoo merger, this shall be carried out by early 2012.
Knowing this should already prepare you should you expand sooner into foreign territory. You should also take into consideration miscellaneous factors, including search engine visibility, as this will aid you later on. Fortunately, having a site such as KeywordSpy would allow you to do that. Using the Tracking function, you will be able to scan the performance of keywords of Yahoo/Bing, as well as know the domains ranking for such keywords. What’s more, you could do this for over 30 countries, including those that have gone into the Bing-Yahoo merger.
Search engine competition has extended beyond the US front, as evidenced by this recent move. If we want to make our mark in the international arena, we need the proper tools to aid us. Fortunately, technology has granted us that.
Peter Zmijewski is the founder and CEO at KeywordSpy. Through Internet Marketing he places his name on great search engine like-GOOGLE who is also called as Innovator, Investor, Internet Marketing Guru and Entrepreneur. For more updates don’t go away, please stay with us.
A New Way of Looking at Ranking Factors
Nov 2nd
SEOmoz readers are no strangers to the concept of search engine ranking factors. In general, much of the community that comments seems to delight when some new factor is discovered that may provide a potential ranking boost. Who wouldn’t, right? But in this post, I’d like to suggest that perhaps some refocusing on the “forest” of the ranking factors world, rather than the individual “trees” that populate it, might be in order.
I’ve been writing about SEO since 1996, from before we even called it SEO and from before Google existed. In those 15+ years, I’ve seen no end of attempts to “chase the algorithm.” My goal, writing to a broad audience, has always been to highlight the important factors that stand the test of time.
It’s not that I’m against testing. I love good discoveries as much as anyone, assuming they’re real, backed by solid data or can be easily confirmed (too many don’t meet these criteria). Understanding if the first use of anchor text overrides further uses or how variations of anchor text across the web might impact rankings is fascinating reading to me. It can help break new SEO ground.
What I am against is wasting time chasing things that might not be helpful for more than a day, week or month, versus time spent on the proven, time-tested factors that matter.
The Periodic Table Of SEO Ranking Factors
That was the genesis behind the Periodic Table Of SEO Ranking Factors that I developed earlier this year, working with the talented folks at Column Five Media to illustrate:
It was a labor of love for me, combining my former profession that of being a newspaper graphics reporter with my current one as a journalist who writes about search engines and search marketing.
The table was designed to highlight what I considered to be the most important ranking factors, so that any experienced SEO could work with someone less knowledgeable and easily explain, in a visual manner, things that might help a site from an SEO perspective.
Want to rank well? It remains incredibly important to have quality content, or Cq. That’s why it’s the first factor listed on the chart.
Want to rank well? It remains incredibly important to have conducted proper keyword research, or Cr, a topic that sometimes feels forgotten in the quest for more exotic ranking factors.
Want to rank well? The locality of a searcher Pl has grown into a major ranking factor that can seem all-but-forgotten by some SEOs who assume that “normal” results still exist and can somehow be found by running proxies or using the pws=0 trick. Google personalizes results down to the metropolitan level in the US and elsewhere. Good luck “adjusting” for that to get your “normal” results.
The Ranking Elements
The table contains four major “element” groups:
- On The Page Factors
- Off The Page Factors
- Blocking Factors
- Violation Factors
Peter Zmijewski is the founder and CEO at KeywordSpy. Through Internet Marketing he places his name on great search engine like-GOOGLE who is also called as Innovator, Investor, Internet Marketing Guru and Entrepreneur. For more updates don’t go away, please stay with us.
Positive and Negative Link Baiting
Nov 1st
Getting into the link bait debate always gets controversial. In fact I often regret it because it seems as though everyone has distinct, borderline passionate, feelings on the subject.
It’s pretty clear that the predominant classification of the kind of content most frequently known as “link bait” is negative. People hate it. People attack it. But people still link to it. So it lives on.
Everything in SEO has gray area. Link bait is no different. If you create anything with the hope that it will serve as “Bait” for linkers, it’s link bait. Whether that means you planned and executed a complicated plan, or laid out a drunken rant against JavaScript.
My last post talked a lot about categorizing link bait and distinguishing link bait from general content. So I’ll keep this brief:
Not Link Bait – Is average content that may answer questions or provide valid information but is standard issue. In fact you can most likely find 15 other websites that have something similar.
Good Link Bait – Is the kind of work that an author can take pride in because it represents the culmination of a long process or a substantial burst of inspiration. It should also be considered exceptional in its space and provide value to users. In order to be link bait it also has to get links.
Bad Link Bait – Is the type of content that is intentionally inflammatory, outlandish, insulting, off-base or just meant to rub people the wrong way. But to be classified as “link bait” it has to pick up links. Otherwise, it’s just making a fool of yourself in public.
When you try to launch a link building campaign whether you head for the dark or the light there are risks and rewards in whatever direction you take.
Good Link Bait
When you go down the link bait high road it can lead to real results. Or not. The thing is you don’t always know. You risk making a flop.
Even if the work is solid, without the right promotion and the right audience, it may not pay off. That means all the time that went into the creation of your 3-month case study may not gain the attention you’d hoped.
On the flip side, though, if you’ve made a few decent contacts in your niche you have the chance to get some help. Whether you reach out to people individually, use social media, newsletters, or even print marketing, the reach of your content can be directly impacted by the size and strength your network. And when a great piece pays off, it can pay off big.
A great piece of legitimate link bait can keep attracting links for a long time. If you were to put together, perhaps, 131 strategies for getting links would you be shocked to find people still commenting on it a decade later? That’s the thing, if you think you can deliver, and have the means to disseminate it, positive link baiting is an amazing strategy.
Bad Link Bait
We’ve all been exposed to some negative link bait at one point or another. It’s the reason the entire concept of link bait seems icky. But it still proves effective, so negative link bait keeps popping up. Just like dandelions. They’re gonna keep sprouting on the lawn because the neighborhood kids like to blow the seeds around.
Yes, you may get links when you decide to announce that “SEO has Gout”. Some people can, and have, made an excellent living out of being jerks. But it doesn’t make you fun at parties. No judgment, just saying.
Sometimes being a controversial character, or taking an unpopular stance can make you interesting, even adored in some cases. Look at Howard Stern. But there is an art to it. People enjoy a good debate, but everybody gets uncomfortable watching a couple fight in public. If you set out to alienate or hurt someone; you will. If you do it by accident, you learn.
Anybody can stumble into a hot zone without realizing it. It happens. At that point you try to run damage control and mitigate the fall out. But intentionally trying to rile a community for the sake of links or comments can backfire.
Being purposefully contrary can lead to a loss in credibility and a strain on your connections. It might not take a powerful network to spread something that people think is crazy. But next time you need a favor you might find some of your resources tapped out. You may also discover that your reputation as a pot stirrer outweighs your distinction as an authority.
Peter Zmijewski is the founder and CEO at KeywordSpy. Through Internet Marketing he places his name on great search engine like-GOOGLE who is also called as Innovator, Investor, Internet Marketing Guru and Entrepreneur. For more updates don’t go away, please stay with us.





